RRU Survey Shows Mixed Opinions on Mid-Course Evaluation Results

Note: this summary was published on Jan 22 and reported again in this blog.

I have sent out the mid-course evaluation survey (Jan 3, 2023) to 120 graduate students. Until now, 18 responses have been received and the response rate is 15%. 83% of the respondents (n=15) agreed to have a mid-course evaluation. 61 % of the respondents (n=11) decided to keep the anonymity of the respondents in mid-course evaluation (WG4). A few elaborated on their responses as follows,

  • Keep it anonymous: “I do not see the need to disclose a student’s name. This would be a barrier to participation. Perhaps make the disclosure optional, or not disclosed at all.”
  • Don’t keep it anonymous: “I believe in providing open honest feedback with course instructors…Mid course evaluations should be standard practice in all RRU courses.”
  • Need more study: “Students should be free to create ongoing evaluation records that are submitted either anonymously or not to a body that is sworn to serve the institution’s interests as outlined in documents reflecting purpose and mission.”