CALS501 Assignment 4: Unit 2
October 20, 2021
In Episode 5 of the Post Carbon Institute’s podcast series entitled What could possibly go right? (2020), Suzanne Moser shares a compelling perspective on the importance of hope in hard and uncertain times, and how uncertainty itself lays the foundation for hope. Moser highlights two core ingredients of hope. The first is getting a real assessment of the current state – what I refer to as ‘facing the facts’ and the uncertainties for the future they present, and second is then searching together for what could possibly be a better way forward (Moser, 2020, 5:34). I found this perspective intriguing because in many ways it brings together the core content of CALS500 – Climate Science, Impacts, and Services, and CALS501 – Leading Climate Action in Society. Climate Science provides us the means for ‘facing the facts’ and getting a real assessment of the current state, and Leading Climate Action in Society focuses us on the art of supporting and empowering others for climate action. This led me to the questions: what are the core ingredients to convening and engaging others in climate action?
Climate action leadership entails working with diverse groups at organizational or community levels to find new ways forward. These groups comprise individuals with diverse life experiences, values and worldviews. Experiences, values and worldviews directly shape how individuals receive and respond to information about climate change (Hodson, 2019, p. 2). Views about climate change can be very different, and like vaccines and masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, views on climate change can be highly polarized. The first core ingredient to convening and engaging others in climate action is then to find common ground from which to begin.
In organizational work, this might begin with working from common organizational values. For example, framing climate action in risk mitigation or business continuity. In community work common values may not be as easily identified. Here lies a second core ingredient which is an initial step in design thinking: to gain understanding and empathy. Crichton and Carter (2017) highlight that we can “gain empathy for a situation by developing understanding of the concerns, insights, lived experiences, and/or needs of others.” (p. 47). Through asking generative questions, perhaps also respectfully asking provocative questions, and then actively listening we gain understanding and empathy. From this learning emerges shared values or shared hopes and worries around which we can begin to collectively engage. Further, through inquiring more systemically and more deeply, we can begin to understand the “assumptions that underpin existing structures and ways of doing things.” (Lonsdale and Turner, 2015, p. 21). Perhaps even belief systems that hold current approaches in place. What then is the next core ingredient to move forward?
The magnitude of the climate crises and the complexity of addressing the climate change challenge can be overwhelming. Research has shown that providing climate change facts to motivate action has limited effectiveness in changing attitudes (Hodson, 2019 p. 2) and can lead to responses such as “doom, dissonance or denial” (Stoknes, 2017). So how then do we work with the tension between facing the facts and supporting and enabling others in climate action? This highlights the next core ingredient: find shared positive aspiration to ignite hope and the human capacity for innovation.
Positive framing around climate action has been shown to promote hope and a sense of self-efficacy (Armstrong et al., 2018). Adaptation refers to “adapting to life in a changing climate” (NASA, n.d.) and offers a more positive framing for climate action. For example, working together to protect shared community assets or a beloved regional ecosystem. Grounding climate action in community-based or organizationally-based adaptation approaches enables people to collaborate around shared positive aspiration and promotes hope.
As climate leadership professionals, climate science grounds our work in evidence and provides us with a real assessment of the current situation. It allows us to consider the diverse and far-reaching impacts of climate change; for example, impacts to human health and human rights, ecosystem health and food systems, and risks to core infrastructure and our communities. Each of these in-turn provides a pathway to talking about climate change. These impacts provide the basis for new conversations about how we might work together to protect what we value and love. Herein lies the balance between being grounded in the scientific facts and igniting the human capacity for empathy, creativity, collective action, and hope.
References
Armstrong, A. K., Schuldt, J. P., & Krasny, M. E. (2018). Establishing trust. Communicating climate change: A guide for educators. Cornell University Press. https://cornellopen.org/9781501730795/communicating-climate-change/
Crichton, S., & Carter, D. (2017) Taking Making Into Classrooms: A Toolkit for Fostering Creativity and Imagination. British Columbia Ministry of Education. file:///Users/jperdue/Downloads/Taking_Making_into_ClassroomsBC2018.pdf
Hodson, J. (2019). An ecological model of climate marketing: A conceptual framework for understanding climate science related attitude and behavior change. Cogent Social Sciences 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1625101
Lonsdale, K., Pringle, P., Turner, B. (2015). Transformative adaptation: what it is, why it matters & what is needed. UK Climate Impacts Programme, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. www.ukcip.org.uk
Moser, S. (2020, July 2). What Could Possible Go Right? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bJTCOROhsA&t=1s
NASA (n.d.). Global Climate Change, Solutions. https://climate.nasa.gov/solutions/adaptation-mitigation/
Stoknes, P.E. (2017, December 8). How to transform apocalypse fatigue into action on global warming [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5h6ynoq8uM
CALS501 Assignment 4: Unit 2 Read More »

